East Brainerd Development Rezoning Vote Fails to Pass
Residents of Chattanooga were left buzzing after the recent decision by the County Commission regarding a major rezoning plan along East Brainerd Road. The proposal aimed to usher in a new commercial development aimed at revitalizing the area by utilizing a prime 6.5-acre parcel of land. However, the motion for this project narrowly failed on Wednesday, leaving some residents relieved and others a bit disappointed.
What Was Proposed?
The original vision from Pratt and Associates was to construct 13 commercial buildings, totaling around 130,000 square feet at 10330 East Brainerd. However, in response to community feedback and concerns, the developers scaled back their dreams significantly, proposing instead four two-story buildings that would amount to 64,000 square feet of commercial space. Pratt’s Ian Blackmore noted that as nearby developments, like the Publix center, start to fill up, their project could attract “supplemental businesses,” providing more options for the locals.
A Divided Commission
Despite the efforts to compromise, the room was thick with tension as the County Commission deliberated the rezoning request. The vote turned out to be closely contested, ending in a 5-5 tie since one member, Ken Smith, was absent. Those in favor of the development included Commissioners Warren Mackey, Mike Chauncey, Joe Graham, Greg Beck, and David Sharpe. However, a vocal group stood firmly against, comprised of Chip Baker, Lee Helton, Steve Highlander, Gene-o Shipley, and Jeff Eversole.
Community Concerns
The opponents of the project raised serious concerns about the existing issues of traffic congestion on East Brainerd Road, highlighting it as a narrow thoroughfare that could not sustain the influx of traffic a new strip mall might generate. Resident Stuart Ellis pointed out the absence of any safe walking paths to access potential shops, deeming the area dangerous for pedestrians. Furthermore, neighbors raised alarm over the natural features of the area, mentioning that the site hosts a significant spring and wetland known to flood frequently.
Sherry Bales, another concerned local, shared her frustrations with the already heavy traffic when trying to exit her driveway during peak hours. “I sit and I sit and I sit,” she described, illustrating the long queues of cars that often line the road. Adding a poignant touch, she noted the wildlife inhabiting the area – including deer and turkeys – asking where these animals would go if the developers push through with their plans.
Historical and Environmental Perspectives
Another resident, Laura Ellis, with deep familial roots in the region, warned that this kind of development could set a troubling precedent. With her family’s land dating back to an 1840 land grant, she expressed fears that approving this would nudge East Brainerd Road closer to resembling the more commercialized and congested Brainerd Road, Ringgold Road, or even Rossville Boulevard.
In a subsequent discussion, the County Commission decided to zone the entire disputed property as residential (R-1), effectively putting an end to the proposed commercial development for now. Yet, there was a glimmer of hope for those still in favor, as mention was made of the possibility for a revote once all 11 members are back in attendance.
Other Business from the Commission
Adding to the day’s developments, the commission also greenlit a $49,000 safety audit of Snow Hill Road and allocated $800,000 for an inclusive playground at Jack Benson Heritage Park. These initiatives reflect ongoing efforts to enhance community safety and recreational opportunities in the bustling city.
The discussion around the failed rezoning is likely not over yet, as this issue appears to spark significant passion among residents on both sides. Only time will tell whether further attempts will be made to transform the East Brainerd area into the commercial hub some desire, or whether the existing residential ambiance and tranquility will continue to prevail.
